Q.1 Statement: Should government ban private vehicles in city centers to reduce pollution? Argument I: Yes, it will improve air quality and public health. Argument II: No, it will inconvenience daily commuters.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I supports the environmental benefit, while Argument II considers practical inconvenience. Both are reasonable.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.2 Statement: Should schools increase online classes to improve learning? Argument I: Yes, students can access more resources online. Argument II: No, it reduces direct teacher-student interaction.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I highlights resource access, Argument II focuses on the importance of interaction. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.3 Statement: Should mobile phones be banned in schools? Argument I: Yes, it will improve student concentration. Argument II: No, it may restrict learning through technology.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I emphasizes focus, Argument II emphasizes learning potential via phones. Both are strong.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.4 Statement: Should governments provide free Wi-Fi in public places? Argument I: Yes, it will promote education and communication. Argument II: No, it may increase cybercrime.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers social benefit, Argument II considers security risk. Both are valid arguments.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.5 Statement: Should plastic bags be completely banned? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce environmental pollution. Argument II: No, it will create inconvenience for daily shopping.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I focuses on environmental benefits, Argument II on practical inconvenience. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.6 Statement: Should higher taxes be imposed on luxury goods? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce unnecessary spending. Argument II: No, it may discourage business and industry.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I is based on curbing extravagance, Argument II on economic impact. Both are logical.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.7 Statement: Should governments reduce working hours to improve work-life balance? Argument I: Yes, it will enhance employee health. Argument II: No, it may reduce productivity.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I supports well-being, Argument II considers productivity. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.8 Statement: Should school uniforms be mandatory? Argument I: Yes, it promotes equality among students. Argument II: No, it limits personal freedom.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers equality, Argument II considers freedom. Both are reasonable.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.9 Statement: Should public transport be made free? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce traffic congestion. Argument II: No, it will increase government expenditure.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I focuses on traffic benefit, Argument II on financial concern. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.10 Statement: Should exams be abolished in schools? Argument I: Yes, it reduces stress for students. Argument II: No, exams assess student learning and performance.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I supports stress reduction, Argument II supports academic assessment. Both are strong.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.11 Statement: Should e-commerce companies be taxed more heavily? Argument I: Yes, it will support small retailers. Argument II: No, it may increase prices for consumers.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I protects small businesses, Argument II considers consumer impact. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.12 Statement: Should advertisements of junk food to children be banned? Argument I: Yes, it promotes healthier eating habits. Argument II: No, it restricts business freedom.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers health benefits, Argument II considers business freedom. Both are reasonable.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.13 Statement: Should government increase funding for renewable energy? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Argument II: No, it is expensive and may not yield immediate results.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I is environmentally beneficial, Argument II considers cost-effectiveness. Both are logical.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.14 Statement: Should children be allowed to play video games freely? Argument I: Yes, it can improve hand-eye coordination. Argument II: No, it may affect studies and health.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I highlights skill improvement, Argument II highlights health and academic concerns. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.15 Statement: Should petrol vehicles be banned in major cities? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce pollution. Argument II: No, it will disrupt transportation.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers environmental benefits, Argument II considers practical challenges. Both are strong.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.16 Statement: Should online voting be introduced in elections? Argument I: Yes, it increases voter convenience. Argument II: No, it may compromise security.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I focuses on ease of voting, Argument II on security risks. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.17 Statement: Should students be allowed to choose their own subjects? Argument I: Yes, it promotes interest-based learning. Argument II: No, it may lead to imbalance in education.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers personalized learning, Argument II considers holistic education. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.18 Statement: Should governments promote cycling in cities? Argument I: Yes, it is eco-friendly. Argument II: No, it may not be practical for long commutes.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I emphasizes environmental benefits, Argument II emphasizes practicality. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.19 Statement: Should social media platforms regulate fake news? Argument I: Yes, it will prevent misinformation. Argument II: No, it may restrict freedom of speech.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I focuses on preventing false information, Argument II considers freedom of expression. Both are reasonable.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.20 Statement: Should governments encourage organic farming? Argument I: Yes, it is healthier and eco-friendly. Argument II: No, it may increase food prices.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I considers health and environmental benefits, Argument II considers economic impact. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.21 Statement: Should advertisements of tobacco products be banned? Argument I: Yes, it will reduce consumption and health risks. Argument II: No, it will reduce revenue for companies.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I focuses on public health, Argument II considers business revenue. Both are strong.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.22 Statement: Should online education replace traditional classrooms? Argument I: Yes, it allows flexible learning. Argument II: No, it lacks face-to-face interaction.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I highlights flexibility, Argument II emphasizes interaction. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.23 Statement: Should governments invest in space research? Argument I: Yes, it leads to technological advancement. Argument II: No, it is expensive and resources can be used elsewhere.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I supports progress, Argument II considers cost. Both are valid arguments.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong
Q.24 Statement: Should students be trained in financial literacy from school? Argument I: Yes, it helps in managing personal finances. Argument II: No, it may overload the curriculum.
Only Argument I is strong
Only Argument II is strong
Both Arguments I and II are strong
Neither Argument I nor II is strong
Explanation - Argument I highlights life skills, Argument II considers academic burden. Both are valid.
Correct answer is: Both Arguments I and II are strong